Gina Miller is taking the public for fools

Gina Miller has won her case against the government. The Prime Minister had hoped to invoke Article 50 herself, but the court has ruled that this would be unconstitutional. It will now be for Parliament to decide when to invoke Article 50.

Following the verdict remainers who don’t accept the referendum are in a stronger position. They may attempt to delay Brexit for as long as possible, or to water it down. The danger is that we get a ‘half Brexit’ that achieves nothing for the 17.4 million people who voted ‘Leave’.

The government will go to the Supreme Court to appeal against the High Court’s decision, but MPs are resigned to losing the appeal.


False praise for Parliamentary Sovereignty


Today, remainers have nothing but praise for that now most sacred of principles, Parliamentary Sovereignty. When she emerged from the court victorious, Miller issued the following self-regarding statement:

“The result today is about all of us, it’s not about me or my team. It’s about our United Kingdom and all our futures. It’s not about how anyone voted; every one of us voted for the best country and the best future. This case was about the process not politics…

The judgment, I hope – when it’s read by the Government and they contemplate the full judgment – that they will make the wise decision of not appealing but pressing forward and having a proper debate in our sovereign parliament, our mother of parliaments that we are so admired for all over the world.

Miller’s pretence is that her intervention is not political – but it is only a pretence.


Miller gives the game away


In an article for the Guardian, Miller gives the game away:

“I was never binary remain or leave. I was very much of the sentiment, and still am, that it was about remain, reform and review”.

“I simply couldn’t keep going to bed every night thinking, well what does [the Brexit vote] mean for my children, what does this mean for the future, what does it mean for everyone?”

Hardly impartial on the referendum question, then…


Remainers are singing from a new hymn sheet


Miller and her fellow travellers who would have us believe that they are merely concerned with maintenance of Parliamentary Sovereignty must take us for fools.

Where were they for the last four decades as Parliament lost ever more competences to the EU

Nowhere.

The truth is that on the rare occasions that remainers mentioned sovereignty, it was to argue that its preservation was no longer feasible in the 21st Century. Britain should instead ‘pool’ its sovereignty with the other EU countries (read: give it up) to enjoy closer cooperation.


The government must keep its promise


Readers may recall the government’s £9,300,000 pro-EU leaflets which were distributed to every household in the country at taxpayers’ expense. In those leaflets the words ‘democracy’ and ‘parliamentary sovereignty’ were conspicuous for their absence.

However, the government did manage to include a promise which formed the basis upon which the entire referendum took place:

This is your decision. The Government will implement what you decide.

On June 23 the people voted for Britain to leave the EU. The government must now implement their wish, in accordance with its promise.

Brexiteers respect parliamentary sovereignty. However, there are concerned by the gulf between the political establishment and the people whom they should represent. 52% of the British public voted to leave, approximately 80% of MPs voted to remain. They are concerned that some MPs will attempt to obstruct Britain’s exit from the EU.


We’ve had the argument


Remain MPs had their chance to make their case to the British people, and they took it. They lost the argument when they failed to convince a majority of the public of the merits of their case.

They must now deliver Brexit. A failure to carry out of the instructions of the British people would virtually decimate public trust in politics, which is already far too low as it is.

Meanwhile, remainers who expound the merits of parliamentary sovereignty while working to stop Westminster regaining powers from Brussels would be well-advised to stop.

It won’t wash.